Duckly vs cDox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Duckly compared with cDox
| Detail | Duckly | cDox |
|---|
| What it does | Real-time pair programming with any IDE
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Growing
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | freemium
| freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Real-time code sharing
- Audio and video calls
- Screen sharing
- Terminal sharing
- Server sharing
- End-to-end encryption
- Multi-IDE support
- Unlimited rooms
| - Real-time collaboration
- Markdown export
- Threaded comments
- Folders and subfolders
- REST API
- Dark mode
- Auto-save
- Public document publishing
- Export to PDF, DOCX, Markdown
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Works with any IDE - developers can use different IDEs simultaneously
- Peer-to-peer and end-to-end encrypted connections
- All collaboration tools in one IDE without switching applications
- Real-time cursor visibility showing other developers' work
| - No AI training on user data
- Hosted in Canada with Canadian privacy law
- No lock-in with open export formats
- Built intentionally small without investors or ads
- Bilingual from day one in English and French
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 57 ● no change since last check | 12 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 22 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 31 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 486 | 85 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Duckly More alternatives to cDox